The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro permeability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives used for immediate dentin sealing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dental Materials Journal, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.4012/dmj.2011-217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cem Sahin, Zafer C Cehreli, Muhittin Yenigul, Bulent Dayangac |
| Abstract |
To investigate the permeability of deep dentin following immediate sealing with different etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives (Single Bond 2, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil Protect Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond, G-Bond) and a dentin desensitizer (Gluma). Fluid-transport model was used to measure fluid conductance during and after application of adhesives. Polyvinylsiloxane impressions of bonded dentin were taken to monitor fluid transudation from the surface of the adhesives. The area and number of dentinal fluid droplets and/or blisters were calculated using image analysis. None of the adhesives were able to block fluid conductance completely. The fluid conductance values of the adhesives displayed the following statistical ranking (p<0.05): G-Bond≤Clearfil Protect Bond<Smear-layer-covered dentin<S3 Bond≤Single Bond 2≤Adper Prompt L-Pop<Gluma Desensitizer<Acid-etched dentin. Highly significant correlation was observed between the permeability of the tested adhesives and the area fraction of fluid droplets/blisters on the adhesive surfaces (r=0.99, p<0.01). |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Dental Materials Journal
#304
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,520
of 176,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Materials Journal
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.