↓ Skip to main content

JCS/JHFS 2018 Guideline on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiomyopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
JCS/JHFS 2018 Guideline on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiomyopathies
Published in
Circulation Journal, July 2021
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-20-0910
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroaki Kitaoka, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Toru Kubo, Tomomi Ide, Taishiro Chikamori, Keiichi Fukuda, Noboru Fujino, Taiki Higo, Mitsuaki Isobe, Chizuko Kamiya, Seiya Kato, Yasuki Kihara, Koichiro Kinugawa, Shintaro Kinugawa, Shigetoyo Kogaki, Issei Komuro, Nobuhisa Hagiwara, Minoru Ono, Yuichiro Maekawa, Shigeru Makita, Yoshiro Matsui, Shouji Matsushima, Yasushi Sakata, Yoshiki Sawa, Wataru Shimizu, Kunihiko Teraoka, Miyuki Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda, Masafumi Watanabe, Michihiro Yoshimura, Arata Fukusima, Satoshi Hida, Shungo Hikoso, Teruhiko Imamura, Hiroko Ishida, Makoto Kawai, Toshiro Kitagawa, Takashi Kohno, Satoshi Kurisu, Yoji Nagata, Makiko Nakamura, Hiroyuki Morita, Hitoshi Takano, Tsuyoshi Shiga, Yasuyoshi Takei, Shinsuke Yuasa, Teppei Yamamoto, Tetsu Watanabe, Takashi Akasaka, Yoshinori Doi, Takeshi Kimura, Masafumi Kitakaze, Masami Kosuge, Morimasa Takayama, Hitonobu Tomoike, on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society Joint Working Group

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Unspecified 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Unspecified 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,925,951
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,164
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,911
of 445,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.