↓ Skip to main content

Comparing mechanisms of host manipulation across host and parasite taxa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Biology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing mechanisms of host manipulation across host and parasite taxa
Published in
Journal of Experimental Biology, December 2012
DOI 10.1242/jeb.073668
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin D. Lafferty, Jenny C. Shaw

Abstract

Parasites affect host behavior in several ways. They can alter activity, microhabitats or both. For trophically transmitted parasites (the focus of our study), decreased activity might impair the ability of hosts to respond to final-host predators, and increased activity and altered microhabitat choice might increase contact rates between hosts and final-host predators. In an analysis of trophically transmitted parasites, more parasite groups altered activity than altered microhabitat choice. Parasites that infected vertebrates were more likely to impair the host's reaction to predators, whereas parasites that infected invertebrates were more likely to increase the host's contact with predators. The site of infection might affect how parasites manipulate their hosts. For instance, parasites in the central nervous system seem particularly suited to manipulating host behavior. Manipulative parasites commonly occupy the body cavity, muscles and central nervous systems of their hosts. Acanthocephalans in the data set differed from other taxa in that they occurred exclusively in the body cavity of invertebrates. In addition, they were more likely to alter microhabitat choice than activity. Parasites in the body cavity (across parasite types) were more likely to be associated with increased host contact with predators. Parasites can manipulate the host through energetic drain, but most parasites use more sophisticated means. For instance, parasites target four physiological systems that shape behavior in both invertebrates and vertebrates: neural, endocrine, neuromodulatory and immunomodulatory. The interconnections between these systems make it difficult to isolate specific mechanisms of host behavioral manipulation.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
France 3 1%
Russia 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 269 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Student > Master 53 18%
Researcher 49 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 41 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 55%
Environmental Science 24 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 54 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,932,868
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#1,159
of 9,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,959
of 286,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#38
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.