You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The association of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy with preterm birth: A retrospective cohort study in California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Karasek, Rebecca J. Baer, Monica R. McLemore, April J. Bell, Bridgette E. Blebu, Joan A. Casey, Kimberly Coleman-Phox, Jean M. Costello, Jennifer N. Felder, Elena Flowers, Jonathan D. Fuchs, Anu Manchikanti Gomez, Kayla Karvonen, Miriam Kuppermann, Liang Liang, Safyer McKenzie-Sampson, Charles E. McCulloch, Scott P. Oltman, Matthew S Pantell, Xianhua Piao, Aric A. Prather, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Karen A. Scott, Solaire Spellen, Jodi D Stookey, Martha Tesfalul, Larry Rand, Laura L. Jelliffe-Pawlowski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 112 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 113 | 76% |
| Scientists | 19 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 174 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 87 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 92 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1346. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#10,065
of 26,255,623 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
#3
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#468
of 445,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,255,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.