The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Establishment and Characterization of the MSKR Inbred Strain Originated from Japanese Wild Mice (Mus musculus molossinus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1292/jvms.62.427 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adumi WADA, Yuka KAKIZOE-ISHIDA, Hideki KATOH, Kaori MUGURUMA, Michi EBUKURO, Masaaki OKUMOTO, Masaoki TSUDZUKI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#290
of 3,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,630
of 108,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.