↓ Skip to main content

COVID-19 Vaccines Safety Tracking (CoVaST): Protocol of a Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study for Active Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines’ Side Effects

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COVID-19 Vaccines Safety Tracking (CoVaST): Protocol of a Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study for Active Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines’ Side Effects
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, July 2021
DOI 10.3390/ijerph18157859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abanoub Riad, Holger Schünemann, Sameh Attia, Tina Poklepović Peričić, Marija Franka Žuljević, Mikk Jürisson, Ruth Kalda, Katrin Lang, Sudhakar Morankar, Elias Ali Yesuf, Mohamed Mekhemar, Anthony Danso-Appiah, Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi, Giordano Pérez-Gaxiola, Arkadiusz Dziedzic, João Apóstolo, Daniela Cardoso, Janja Marc, Mayte Moreno-Casbas, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Amir Qaseem, Anna Gryschek, Ivana Tadić, Salman Hussain, Mohammed Ahmed Khan, Jitka Klugarova, Andrea Pokorna, Michal Koščík, Miloslav Klugar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Master 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 84 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 85 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,683,634
of 25,978,998 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#7,674
of 32,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,066
of 446,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#367
of 1,689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,978,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.