The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
イベルメクチン,ファビピラビルのジェネリック医薬品:液体クロマトグラフィー/質量分析法 (LC-MS)を用いた品質評価
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1625/jcam.18.47 |
| Authors |
Nobutaka SUZUKI, Masahiko TAKINO |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 18% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,136,725
of 26,445,299 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#2
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,376
of 451,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them