The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ICU常駐薬剤師が貢献した薬剤による舌・咽頭浮腫が原因で呼吸困難をもたらした1症例
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.11240/jsem.24.588 |
Authors |
山本 浩二郎, 前田 晃佑, 原口 珠実, 里岡 達哉, 青山 瑛里子, 横山 靖法, 草薙 みか, 大里 恭章 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 25% |
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,780,424
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#45
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,556
of 436,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.