The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanistic invasive species management models and their application in conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Science and Practice, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/csp2.533 |
| Authors |
Brielle K. Thompson, Julian D. Olden, Sarah J. Converse |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 30% |
| Unknown | 16 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 28 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,676,828
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#409
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,839
of 438,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#22
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.