↓ Skip to main content

シーア派法学における『善の命令と悪の阻止』理論の発展とホメイニーによるその革新

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Japan Association for Middle East Studies, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
シーア派法学における『善の命令と悪の阻止』理論の発展とホメイニーによるその革新
Published in
Annals of Japan Association for Middle East Studies, March 2018
DOI 10.24498/ajames.12.0_61
Authors

中田 考

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,847,487
of 26,103,952 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Japan Association for Middle East Studies
#1
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,646
of 347,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Japan Association for Middle East Studies
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,103,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.