The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
慣性変化法を用いたガラス溶融炉における自然対流の数値計算に関する基礎研究
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Proceedings of the Thermal Engineering Conference, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1299/jsmeted.2020.0180 |
| Authors |
高口 祥平, 高橋 秀治, 木倉 宏成 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from The Proceedings of the Thermal Engineering Conference
#6
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,526
of 466,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Proceedings of the Thermal Engineering Conference
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them