↓ Skip to main content

刑罰に対する考え方が量刑判断に及ぼす影響-厳罰志向性尺度の作成と検討-

Overview of attention for article published in The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
刑罰に対する考え方が量刑判断に及ぼす影響-厳罰志向性尺度の作成と検討-
Published in
The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, December 2020
DOI 10.4992/pacjpa.76.0_2evd23
Authors

板山 昂

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2021.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
#166
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#405,456
of 530,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
#30
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.