The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
維持血液透析患者における生命予後予測因子としての足趾上腕血圧比(Toe‒brachial pressure index)の有用性
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.4009/jsdt.54.449 |
Authors |
Jun Yoshii, Takafumi Noji, Wataru Katsuno, Mao Tamura, Miho Hasegawa, Takumi Endou, Akiko Morisue, Toshiyuki Aoki, Itaru Yokouchi, Kaoru Sugi, Shinichi Watanabe, Hironobu Nishimura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,407,338
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#64
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,863
of 438,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them