↓ Skip to main content

Responses of migratory amphibians to barrier fencing inform the spacing of road underpasses: a case study with California tiger salamanders (Ambystoma californiense) in Stanford, CA, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Responses of migratory amphibians to barrier fencing inform the spacing of road underpasses: a case study with California tiger salamanders (Ambystoma californiense) in Stanford, CA, USA
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, November 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01857
Authors

Cheryl S. Brehme, Jeff A. Tracey, Brittany A.I. Ewing, Michael T. Hobbs, Alan E. Launer, Tritia A. Matsuda, Esther M. Cole Adelsheim, Robert N. Fisher

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 24 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 23%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 26 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,769,080
of 25,954,278 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#934
of 1,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,904
of 447,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#67
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,954,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.