The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
大規模災害における国際医療救援資機材輸送の実態分析
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management), January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2208/jscejipm.74.i_141 |
| Authors |
曽篠 恭裕, 宮田 昭, 柿本 竜治 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,949,326
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#22
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,425
of 451,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.