↓ Skip to main content

信頼性理論に基づく最適設計 : 強度の経年劣化を考えた構造物の荷重係数

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), January 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
信頼性理論に基づく最適設計 : 強度の経年劣化を考えた構造物の荷重係数
Published in
Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), January 1990
DOI 10.3130/aijsx.418.0_81
Authors

Ki KOH, Koichi TAKANASHI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,093
of 60,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them