↓ Skip to main content

ルール遊び研究への一視点 : 「目標水準」仮説の再検討と今後の課題(<特集>遊び)

Overview of attention for article published in THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ルール遊び研究への一視点 : 「目標水準」仮説の再検討と今後の課題(<特集>遊び)
Published in
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, September 2017
DOI 10.20789/jraps.8.1_1
Authors

河崎 道夫

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
#3
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,209
of 324,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.