↓ Skip to main content

Morphological Characteristic at Entrance of Lake Saroma and Development of Numerical Model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering), January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morphological Characteristic at Entrance of Lake Saroma and Development of Numerical Model
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering), January 2012
DOI 10.2208/kaigan.68.i_556
Authors

Yoshinori YAMAKAMI, Yoichi SAKAMOTO, Jun KAWAI, Yoshiaki FUJII, Koji HASHIMOTO, Toshihiko YAMASHITA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,875,193
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering)
#4
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,208
of 253,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering)
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them