↓ Skip to main content

中島敦「盈虚」 と「牛人」の世界

Overview of attention for article published in HIKAKU BUNGAKU Journal of Comparative Literature, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
中島敦「盈虚」 と「牛人」の世界
Published in
HIKAKU BUNGAKU Journal of Comparative Literature, June 2017
DOI 10.20613/hikaku.20.0_28
Authors

西谷 博之

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from HIKAKU BUNGAKU Journal of Comparative Literature
#6
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,561
of 335,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIKAKU BUNGAKU Journal of Comparative Literature
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 38 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.