The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Infestation of honey bees by tracheal mites, Acarapis woodi, in Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Acarological Society of Japan, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.2300/acari.24.9 |
Authors |
Taro MAEDA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Engineering | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Acarological Society of Japan
#7
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,131
of 355,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Acarological Society of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them