↓ Skip to main content

一二-一五世紀初頭東アジアにおける銅銭の流布 : 日本・中国を中心として

Overview of attention for article published in Shakai keizai shigaku, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 142)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
一二-一五世紀初頭東アジアにおける銅銭の流布 : 日本・中国を中心として
Published in
Shakai keizai shigaku, June 2017
DOI 10.20624/sehs.61.2_156
Authors

大田 由紀夫

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Shakai keizai shigaku
#11
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,298
of 330,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shakai keizai shigaku
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.