↓ Skip to main content

鉄道廃線敷を活用した観光施設の現状~日独の事例から~

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Transportation Economics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
鉄道廃線敷を活用した観光施設の現状~日独の事例から~
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Transportation Economics, May 2019
DOI 10.32238/koutsugakkai.60.0_39
Authors

渡邉 亮, 遠藤 俊太郎, 曽我 治夫

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Transportation Economics
#3
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,909
of 365,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Transportation Economics
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.