↓ Skip to main content

クラインフェルター症候群に対する精巣内精子を用いた顕微授精 : 第86回日本泌尿器科学会総会

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 203)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
クラインフェルター症候群に対する精巣内精子を用いた顕微授精 : 第86回日本泌尿器科学会総会
Published in
Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, January 1998
DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol.89.370_1
Authors

磯山 忠広, 山本 泰久, ニコラオス ソフィキティス, 見尾 保幸, 宮川 征男

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,835,526
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#29
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,140
of 96,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them