↓ Skip to main content

大腿四頭筋拘縮症 (短縮症) について

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Showa University Society, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 119)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
大腿四頭筋拘縮症 (短縮症) について
Published in
Journal of The Showa University Society, September 2010
DOI 10.14930/jsma1939.67.43
Authors

阪本 桂造

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Showa University Society
#27
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,335
of 106,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Showa University Society
#10
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.