↓ Skip to main content

我が国の温泉医学振興のあり方に関する研究

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
我が国の温泉医学振興のあり方に関する研究
Published in
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine, September 2018
DOI 10.11390/onki.81_2.76
Authors

合田 純人, P. J. バロン, 三友 紀男

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine
#10
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,909
of 353,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them