↓ Skip to main content

A document survey of historical floods and damages of the Yasu River

Overview of attention for article published in HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 132)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A document survey of historical floods and damages of the Yasu River
Published in
HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, January 1995
DOI 10.2208/journalhs1990.15.437
Authors

Seizou TAKEBAYASHI, Takao NAKASUMI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,875,193
of 26,203,160 outputs
Outputs from HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
#16
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,325
of 77,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,203,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.