↓ Skip to main content

Microhabitats chosen by cyprinid fish, Zacco platypus for spawning in floodplain pool

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecology-Japan, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microhabitats chosen by cyprinid fish, Zacco platypus for spawning in floodplain pool
Published in
Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecology-Japan, January 2001
DOI 10.5738/jale.6.57
Authors

Shingo YAMASHITA, Masatoshi DENDA, Nobukazu NAKAGOSHI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecology-Japan
#1
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,247
of 114,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecology-Japan
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them