↓ Skip to main content

Cytologic and Electron Microscopic Studies on the Intestinal Respiration of the Loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Histology and Cytology, January 1963
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 108)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytologic and Electron Microscopic Studies on the Intestinal Respiration of the Loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus)
Published in
Archives of Histology and Cytology, January 1963
DOI 10.1679/aohc1950.23.431
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasunobu SUZUKI, Mitsuhiro OSADA, Akira WATANABE

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Histology and Cytology
#19
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#698
of 8,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Histology and Cytology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them