↓ Skip to main content

江戸時代初期の関所 : 関所手形・借金証文の分析を通じて(例会報告要旨)

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Review of Transport and Communications, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
江戸時代初期の関所 : 関所手形・借金証文の分析を通じて(例会報告要旨)
Published in
Historical Review of Transport and Communications, October 2017
DOI 10.20712/kotsushi.47.0_80
Authors

渡辺 和敏

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Historical Review of Transport and Communications
#9
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,863
of 332,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Review of Transport and Communications
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.