The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
腸管細胞増殖と腸管フローラ
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intestinal Microbiology, July 2005
|
DOI | 10.11209/jim.19.1 |
Authors |
佐々木 雅也, 荒木 克夫, 辻川 知之, 安藤 朗, 藤山 佳秀 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 33% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 22% |
Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 67% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intestinal Microbiology
#23
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,030
of 69,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intestinal Microbiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them