↓ Skip to main content

遷音速機の設計について(座談会)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of the Society of Aeronautical Science of Nippon, January 1957
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
遷音速機の設計について(座談会)
Published in
The Journal of the Society of Aeronautical Science of Nippon, January 1957
DOI 10.2322/jjsass1953.5.100
Authors

守屋 富次郎, 木村 秀政, 久保 富夫, 北野 純, 菊原 静男, 渋谷 厳, 萱場 嘉郎, 箕田 芳郎, 疋田 遼太郎, 河村 竜馬

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Society of Aeronautical Science of Nippon
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#478
of 6,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Society of Aeronautical Science of Nippon
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them