The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regional variations in the Jomon population revisited on craniofacial morphology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anthropological Science, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1537/ase.170428 |
| Authors |
OSAMU KONDO, HITOSHI FUKASE, TAKASHI FUKUMOTO |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Anthropological Science
#73
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,580
of 425,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anthropological Science
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.