↓ Skip to main content

庄内平野東縁における完新世の断層活動と1894年 (明治27年) 庄内地震

Overview of attention for article published in Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan), January 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
庄内平野東縁における完新世の断層活動と1894年 (明治27年) 庄内地震
Published in
Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan), January 1989
DOI 10.4294/zisin1948.42.2_151
Authors

鈴木 康弘, 池田 安隆, 渡辺 満久, 須貝 俊彦, 米倉 伸之

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,966,926
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan)
#62
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,375
of 54,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan)
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.