↓ Skip to main content

水産業における情報技術の活用について-II : 測深データの解析と海底地形図の作成

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
水産業における情報技術の活用について-II : 測深データの解析と海底地形図の作成
Published in
The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation, January 2017
DOI 10.9749/jin.115.83
Authors

和田 雅昭, 畑中 勝守, 雫石 雅美

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation
#5
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,568
of 443,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.