The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting the potential habitat of white-spotted charr in central Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecology-Japan, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.5738/jale.6.119 |
| Authors |
Yoichi KAWAGUCHI, Hiromune MITSUHASHI, Tetsuo TANAKA, Aki MITSUHASHI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecology-Japan
#1
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,247
of 114,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecology-Japan
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them