↓ Skip to main content

H101 VDT関連用語の適切な使用 : 「眼精疲労」と「テクノストレス」 : VDT健康影響関連情報の公開(1)

Overview of attention for article published in Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
H101 VDT関連用語の適切な使用 : 「眼精疲労」と「テクノストレス」 : VDT健康影響関連情報の公開(1)
Published in
Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health, January 2005
DOI 10.1539/sangyoeisei.kj00003804055
Authors

山室 栄三, 三浦 正悦, 横田 等, 山崎 了司, 中野 義彦

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,890,680
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health
#61
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,786
of 154,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.