The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
特集号「風化─ナノスケールからグローバルスケールまで─ 1. 微視的風化と基礎研究」序説
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5026/jgeography.126.267 |
| Authors |
松岡 憲知, 小口 千明, 福士 圭介, 松四 雄騎, 横山 正 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 75% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
#145
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,808
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.