↓ Skip to main content

2-1. Computational Photography

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2-1. Computational Photography
Published in
The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, January 2009
DOI 10.3169/itej.63.274
Authors

Shinsaku Hiura

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers
#53
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,780
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.