↓ Skip to main content

Studies on Heavy Muscle Work under the Environments of High Temperature and Humidity

Overview of attention for article published in Okayama Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Okayama Medical Association), January 1966
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Studies on Heavy Muscle Work under the Environments of High Temperature and Humidity
Published in
Okayama Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Okayama Medical Association), January 1966
DOI 10.4044/joma1947.78.1_159
Authors

Itsuo Ko

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,802,292
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Okayama Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Okayama Medical Association)
#11
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#925
of 11,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Okayama Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Okayama Medical Association)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them