↓ Skip to main content

氷川丸 (<シリーズ>日本の保存船)

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Japan, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
氷川丸 (<シリーズ>日本の保存船)
Published in
Bulletin of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Japan, February 2018
DOI 10.14856/ran.28.0_34
Authors

竹田 太樹

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Japan
#2
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,059
of 347,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Japan
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.