↓ Skip to main content

RDF の発熱事故例と発熱メカニズムの化学的考察

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 109)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RDF の発熱事故例と発熱メカニズムの化学的考察
Published in
Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering, November 2016
DOI 10.18943/safety.45.2_117
Authors

安原 昭夫

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering
#13
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,354
of 418,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.