↓ Skip to main content

2.チロシンアミノ転移酵素の誘導現象と環状ヌクレオチド(ビタミンB研究委員会 : 第242回会議研究発表要旨)

Overview of attention for article published in VITAMINS, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 124)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2.チロシンアミノ転移酵素の誘導現象と環状ヌクレオチド(ビタミンB研究委員会 : 第242回会議研究発表要旨)
Published in
VITAMINS, March 2018
DOI 10.20632/vso.52.3_150
Authors

西塚 泰美

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from VITAMINS
#11
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,743
of 349,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from VITAMINS
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.