↓ Skip to main content

14.DPN生合成におけるトリプトファンとナヤシンの意義(第144回会議研究発表要旨)

Overview of attention for article published in VITAMINS, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 124)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
14.DPN生合成におけるトリプトファンとナヤシンの意義(第144回会議研究発表要旨)
Published in
VITAMINS, January 2018
DOI 10.20632/vso.28.2_200_2
Authors

早石 修, 西塚 泰美

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from VITAMINS
#11
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,940
of 452,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from VITAMINS
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.