↓ Skip to main content

2 稲作地域における環境因子と気管支喘息 : 穀物粉塵と野焼きを中心に(化学物質過敏症の診断・治療と問題点)

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2 稲作地域における環境因子と気管支喘息 : 穀物粉塵と野焼きを中心に(化学物質過敏症の診断・治療と問題点)
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.53.224_1
Authors

萱場 広之

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#75
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,417
of 432,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#46
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.