↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial coldwater disease in coho salmon

Overview of attention for article published in NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial coldwater disease in coho salmon
Published in
NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2005
DOI 10.2331/suisan.71.645
Authors

AKIRA KUMAGAI

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 33%
France 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,875,607
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#149
of 909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,754
of 153,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 909 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.