↓ Skip to main content

On the Regional Differences in Social and Traditional Folk-Customs in the Shima Peninsula, Mie Prefecture, and their Geographical Significance

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Human Geography, January 1964
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the Regional Differences in Social and Traditional Folk-Customs in the Shima Peninsula, Mie Prefecture, and their Geographical Significance
Published in
Japanese Journal of Human Geography, January 1964
DOI 10.4200/jjhg1948.16.449
Authors

Tokuji CHIBA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Human Geography
#67
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#808
of 9,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Human Geography
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.