↓ Skip to main content

13. 財団法人目黒寄生虫館(東京)の保管する,尾崎佳正博士の寄生虫標本について(動物分類学会第30回大会記事)

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
13. 財団法人目黒寄生虫館(東京)の保管する,尾崎佳正博士の寄生虫標本について(動物分類学会第30回大会記事)
Published in
Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, March 2018
DOI 10.19004/pjssz.51.0_77_3
Authors

嶋津 武

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#3
of 18 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,857
of 344,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.