The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Contamination of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Seafoods in Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Food Microbiology, January 2003
|
DOI | 10.5803/jsfm.20.63 |
Authors |
HARA Yasuko, Maki IZUMISAWA, Kumiko ISHII, ABE Akihisa, Eiji OHASHI, Tsutomu MARUYAMA |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,255,714
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Food Microbiology
#5
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,949
of 139,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Food Microbiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them