↓ Skip to main content

中国の大学生の身体活動に関するー考察 : 中国と日本の男子大学生の日常生活における身体活動量の相違について

Overview of attention for article published in Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences), January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
中国の大学生の身体活動に関するー考察 : 中国と日本の男子大学生の日常生活における身体活動量の相違について
Published in
Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences), January 1992
DOI 10.5432/jjpehss.kj00003391839
Authors

Tsutomu Suda, Zuien Mu, Yoichi Muroki

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
#64
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,376
of 61,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them