↓ Skip to main content

A clinico-statistical study of patients with aerophagia (teeth clenching aerophagia syndrome) and associated complaints in the head and neck region

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychosomatic Oral Medicine, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A clinico-statistical study of patients with aerophagia (teeth clenching aerophagia syndrome) and associated complaints in the head and neck region
Published in
Journal of Psychosomatic Oral Medicine, September 2011
DOI 10.11268/jjpsd1986.22.73
Authors

Hiroko Kimura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychosomatic Oral Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,594
of 143,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychosomatic Oral Medicine
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.